Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Semi-Automated Data Collection in the Interventional Radiology Clinic.
Identifieur interne : 000059 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000058; suivant : 000060Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Semi-Automated Data Collection in the Interventional Radiology Clinic.
Auteurs : Nam S. Hoang [États-Unis] ; Winifred Hwang [États-Unis] ; Danielle A. Katz [États-Unis] ; Sean C. Mackey [États-Unis] ; Lawrence V. Hofmann [États-Unis]Source :
- Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR [ 1558-349X ] ; 2019.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Automatisation (MeSH), Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH), Femelle (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Lymphoedème (thérapie), Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (MeSH), Mâle (MeSH), Ordinateurs de poche (MeSH), Qualité de vie (MeSH), Radiologie interventionnelle (MeSH), Thrombose veineuse (thérapie).
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Patient-reported outcomes are important for clinical research and will likely be used in the near future as a metric for physician reimbursement. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of an electronic data collection system for deep vein thrombosis and lymphedema quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires in a tertiary care interventional radiology practice.
METHODS
A single provider's clinic patients were automatically e-mailed validated questionnaires 1 week before their appointments. If not completed via e-mail, the questionnaire was administered on an electronic tablet in clinic by a research coordinator. Patients were also sent postprocedure questionnaires.
RESULTS
In all, 106 patients visited the clinic for a pre-intervention venous consultation. Of them, 96% (n = 102 of 106) completed the pre-intervention questionnaire: 48% (n = 47 of 98) via e-mail and 52% (n = 51 of 98) via tablet. Of the patients who had procedures and were sent questionnaires, 49% (n = 26 of 53) were seen in person. Of the postprocedure in-person clinic patients, 76% (n = 20 of 26) completed the questionnaire via e-mail, and the remainder with the tablet in clinic. Twenty-seven of the 53 (51%) patients did not return for follow-up and instead were sent an electronic questionnaire as their only source of follow-up, of which 74% (n = 20 of 27) complied.
CONCLUSION
After an initial introduction to electronic QOL reporting, patients were more likely to complete the questionnaires remotely for their follow-up appointment. A semi-automated electronic QOL system allows physicians to collect patient outcome data even in the absence of a clinic visit.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.033
PubMed: 30297246
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Semi-Automated Data Collection in the Interventional Radiology Clinic.</title><author><name sortKey="Hoang, Nam S" sort="Hoang, Nam S" uniqKey="Hoang N" first="Nam S" last="Hoang">Nam S. Hoang</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hwang, Winifred" sort="Hwang, Winifred" uniqKey="Hwang W" first="Winifred" last="Hwang">Winifred Hwang</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Katz, Danielle A" sort="Katz, Danielle A" uniqKey="Katz D" first="Danielle A" last="Katz">Danielle A. Katz</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mackey, Sean C" sort="Mackey, Sean C" uniqKey="Mackey S" first="Sean C" last="Mackey">Sean C. Mackey</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hofmann, Lawrence V" sort="Hofmann, Lawrence V" uniqKey="Hofmann L" first="Lawrence V" last="Hofmann">Lawrence V. Hofmann</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: lhofmann@stanford.edu.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2019">2019</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:30297246</idno><idno type="pmid">30297246</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.033</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000061</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000061</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000060</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000060</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000060</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Semi-Automated Data Collection in the Interventional Radiology Clinic.</title><author><name sortKey="Hoang, Nam S" sort="Hoang, Nam S" uniqKey="Hoang N" first="Nam S" last="Hoang">Nam S. Hoang</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hwang, Winifred" sort="Hwang, Winifred" uniqKey="Hwang W" first="Winifred" last="Hwang">Winifred Hwang</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Katz, Danielle A" sort="Katz, Danielle A" uniqKey="Katz D" first="Danielle A" last="Katz">Danielle A. Katz</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mackey, Sean C" sort="Mackey, Sean C" uniqKey="Mackey S" first="Sean C" last="Mackey">Sean C. Mackey</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hofmann, Lawrence V" sort="Hofmann, Lawrence V" uniqKey="Hofmann L" first="Lawrence V" last="Hofmann">Lawrence V. Hofmann</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: lhofmann@stanford.edu.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR</title><idno type="eISSN">1558-349X</idno><imprint><date when="2019" type="published">2019</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Automation (MeSH)</term><term>Computers, Handheld (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Lymphedema (therapy)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Patient Reported Outcome Measures (MeSH)</term><term>Quality of Life (MeSH)</term><term>Radiology, Interventional (MeSH)</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH)</term><term>Venous Thrombosis (therapy)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Automatisation (MeSH)</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Lymphoedème (thérapie)</term><term>Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Ordinateurs de poche (MeSH)</term><term>Qualité de vie (MeSH)</term><term>Radiologie interventionnelle (MeSH)</term><term>Thrombose veineuse (thérapie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="therapy" xml:lang="en"><term>Lymphedema</term><term>Venous Thrombosis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="thérapie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Lymphoedème</term><term>Thrombose veineuse</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Automation</term><term>Computers, Handheld</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Radiology, Interventional</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Automatisation</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ordinateurs de poche</term><term>Qualité de vie</term><term>Radiologie interventionnelle</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>INTRODUCTION</b></p><p>Patient-reported outcomes are important for clinical research and will likely be used in the near future as a metric for physician reimbursement. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of an electronic data collection system for deep vein thrombosis and lymphedema quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires in a tertiary care interventional radiology practice.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>A single provider's clinic patients were automatically e-mailed validated questionnaires 1 week before their appointments. If not completed via e-mail, the questionnaire was administered on an electronic tablet in clinic by a research coordinator. Patients were also sent postprocedure questionnaires.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>In all, 106 patients visited the clinic for a pre-intervention venous consultation. Of them, 96% (n = 102 of 106) completed the pre-intervention questionnaire: 48% (n = 47 of 98) via e-mail and 52% (n = 51 of 98) via tablet. Of the patients who had procedures and were sent questionnaires, 49% (n = 26 of 53) were seen in person. Of the postprocedure in-person clinic patients, 76% (n = 20 of 26) completed the questionnaire via e-mail, and the remainder with the tablet in clinic. Twenty-seven of the 53 (51%) patients did not return for follow-up and instead were sent an electronic questionnaire as their only source of follow-up, of which 74% (n = 20 of 27) complied.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>After an initial introduction to electronic QOL reporting, patients were more likely to complete the questionnaires remotely for their follow-up appointment. A semi-automated electronic QOL system allows physicians to collect patient outcome data even in the absence of a clinic visit.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">30297246</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2019</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1558-349X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>16</Volume><Issue>4 Pt A</Issue><PubDate><Year>2019</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR</Title></Journal><ArticleTitle>Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Semi-Automated Data Collection in the Interventional Radiology Clinic.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>472-477</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S1546-1440(18)31063-9</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.033</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="INTRODUCTION" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Patient-reported outcomes are important for clinical research and will likely be used in the near future as a metric for physician reimbursement. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of an electronic data collection system for deep vein thrombosis and lymphedema quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires in a tertiary care interventional radiology practice.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">A single provider's clinic patients were automatically e-mailed validated questionnaires 1 week before their appointments. If not completed via e-mail, the questionnaire was administered on an electronic tablet in clinic by a research coordinator. Patients were also sent postprocedure questionnaires.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">In all, 106 patients visited the clinic for a pre-intervention venous consultation. Of them, 96% (n = 102 of 106) completed the pre-intervention questionnaire: 48% (n = 47 of 98) via e-mail and 52% (n = 51 of 98) via tablet. Of the patients who had procedures and were sent questionnaires, 49% (n = 26 of 53) were seen in person. Of the postprocedure in-person clinic patients, 76% (n = 20 of 26) completed the questionnaire via e-mail, and the remainder with the tablet in clinic. Twenty-seven of the 53 (51%) patients did not return for follow-up and instead were sent an electronic questionnaire as their only source of follow-up, of which 74% (n = 20 of 27) complied.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">After an initial introduction to electronic QOL reporting, patients were more likely to complete the questionnaires remotely for their follow-up appointment. A semi-automated electronic QOL system allows physicians to collect patient outcome data even in the absence of a clinic visit.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hoang</LastName><ForeName>Nam S</ForeName><Initials>NS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hwang</LastName><ForeName>Winifred</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Katz</LastName><ForeName>Danielle A</ForeName><Initials>DA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mackey</LastName><ForeName>Sean C</ForeName><Initials>SC</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hofmann</LastName><ForeName>Lawrence V</ForeName><Initials>LV</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: lhofmann@stanford.edu.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2018</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>05</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Am Coll Radiol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101190326</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1546-1440</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001331" MajorTopicYN="N">Automation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D034201" MajorTopicYN="N">Computers, Handheld</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008209" MajorTopicYN="N">Lymphedema</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000628" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapy</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000071066" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Reported Outcome Measures</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011788" MajorTopicYN="N">Quality of Life</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015642" MajorTopicYN="Y">Radiology, Interventional</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020246" MajorTopicYN="N">Venous Thrombosis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000628" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapy</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">CHOIR</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">DVT</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">ePRO</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">lymphedema</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">patient-reported outcomes</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2018</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2018</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2018</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>23</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2018</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2019</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2018</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30297246</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1546-1440(18)31063-9</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.033</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Californie</li></region></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Californie"><name sortKey="Hoang, Nam S" sort="Hoang, Nam S" uniqKey="Hoang N" first="Nam S" last="Hoang">Nam S. Hoang</name></region><name sortKey="Hofmann, Lawrence V" sort="Hofmann, Lawrence V" uniqKey="Hofmann L" first="Lawrence V" last="Hofmann">Lawrence V. Hofmann</name><name sortKey="Hwang, Winifred" sort="Hwang, Winifred" uniqKey="Hwang W" first="Winifred" last="Hwang">Winifred Hwang</name><name sortKey="Katz, Danielle A" sort="Katz, Danielle A" uniqKey="Katz D" first="Danielle A" last="Katz">Danielle A. Katz</name><name sortKey="Mackey, Sean C" sort="Mackey, Sean C" uniqKey="Mackey S" first="Sean C" last="Mackey">Sean C. Mackey</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteChoraleV4/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000059 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000059 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SanteChoraleV4
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:30297246
|texte= Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Semi-Automated Data Collection in the Interventional Radiology Clinic.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:30297246" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteChoraleV4
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |